While the idea of a bunker is appealing, I think focusing on community and resourcefulness above ground might be a more practical long-term survival strategy.
While I appreciate the ambition of a 100M survival plan, I think the practical challenges of sustaining a population that large in a bunker environment are severely underestimated in the article. Resource management alone would be a logistical nightmare.
While the idea of a bunker is appealing, I think focusing on community and resourcefulness within a wider, less isolated area might be a more realistic and sustainable survival strategy in the long run. A bunker sounds great in theory, but what happens when supplies run out or unexpected long-term issues arise?
While a bunker is a good starting point, 100 million is a massive amount, and I think focusing on community building and resource management outside of a bunker would be a more sustainable long-term strategy. Relying solely on a fortified position feels a bit too passive, in my opinion.
While I appreciate the ambition, realistically surviving in a bunker for that long would require far more than just the supplies mentioned. The psychological toll alone would be immense and often overlooked in these scenarios.
While the idea of a bunker is appealing, I think focusing on community and resourcefulness above ground might be a more practical long-term survival strategy.
While I appreciate the ambition of a 100M survival plan, I think the practical challenges of sustaining a population that large in a bunker environment are severely underestimated in the article. Resource management alone would be a logistical nightmare.
While the idea of a bunker is appealing, I think focusing on community and resourcefulness within a wider, less isolated area might be a more realistic and sustainable survival strategy in the long run. A bunker sounds great in theory, but what happens when supplies run out or unexpected long-term issues arise?
While a bunker is a good starting point, 100 million is a massive amount, and I think focusing on community building and resource management outside of a bunker would be a more sustainable long-term strategy. Relying solely on a fortified position feels a bit too passive, in my opinion.
While I appreciate the ambition, realistically surviving in a bunker for that long would require far more than just the supplies mentioned. The psychological toll alone would be immense and often overlooked in these scenarios.